Which type of defenses includes duress, entrapment, renunciation, and mental defect?

The correct choice is affirmative defenses. This type of defense allows a defendant to provide new information or evidence that justifies or excuses their actions, even if the prosecution's claims are true. In the context of criminal law, affirmative defenses such as duress, entrapment, renunciation, and mental defect raise the argument that there are circumstances that mitigate or eliminate the defendant's responsibility for the criminal act.

Duress refers to situations where a person commits an act because they believe they are in immediate danger or threatened. Entrapment involves scenarios where law enforcement induces a person to commit a crime they would not have otherwise committed. Renunciation can be understood as a defense where the defendant voluntarily withdrew from committing a crime, thereby negating the culpability. Finally, a mental defect might serve as a basis to claim that a person could not comprehend their actions at the time due to a mental illness, leading to a lack of intent or culpability.

The other options represent different legal concepts. Defensive might imply a general counter to prosecution but does not encompass this specific range of defenses. Negative defenses usually assert that the defendant did not commit the act, rather than providing reasons that could justify the act. Invalid generally refers to defenses or arguments that are not recognized by