Which of the following actions is justified under the deadly physical force framework established by the outlined acronyms?

The choice of defensive action against murder threats is justified under the deadly physical force framework because it aligns with the principles of self-defense and the protection of life. When an individual is faced with an imminent threat to their life or the threat of severe bodily harm, the use of deadly physical force may be warranted as a means of protecting oneself or others from that clear and present danger.

In legal contexts, the justification for employing deadly physical force typically requires that the individual believes they are in immediate danger and that the response is proportionate to the threat presented. In the case of defending against murder threats, the imminent nature of the threat and the potential consequences justify the response.

Other options, such as resisting arrest, attacking peace officers without a weapon, or threatening with physical harm, do not meet the criteria established for the warranted use of deadly force. These actions either involve aggression towards law enforcement or do not constitute self-defense, thus falling outside the protections offered by the framework governing the use of deadly physical force.