What is typically required during direct examination?

During direct examination, the primary goal is to elicit factual information from a witness to support the case being presented. This involves asking open-ended questions that allow the witness to describe their observations and experiences relevant to the case. By focusing on factual information, the attorney can establish a clear and cohesive narrative that helps the audience, including the jury, understand the surrounding circumstances and details that are significant to the case.

Including facts from the witness's testimony is essential for building a credible and compelling argument. It lays the foundation for the evidence that supports the claims being made. Therefore, factual arguments are critical during direct examination as they help in substantiating the case being argued.

While the other options hint at aspects of courtroom procedure, they do not align with the standards of direct examination. Leading questions, for example, are typically avoided in direct examination as they may suggest the answer to the witness, which could undermine the authenticity of their testimony. Similarly, focusing on hypothetical scenarios can divert from the concrete facts needed to build a strong case. Instead of abstract arguments, presenting a structured sequence of factual statements is essential for a successful direct examination.