What is the reasoning for civilians being justified to use physical force?

Civilians are justified in using physical force primarily when they are trying to protect themselves or others. This concept is rooted in the legal principle of self-defense, which allows individuals to take measures to safeguard themselves or another person from imminent harm or threat. The use of force must be reasonable and proportionate to the threat encountered; it often hinges on whether the individual genuinely believes that their or someone else's safety is at risk.

In situations where there is a clear and present danger, the law allows for a response that can include physical force to neutralize that threat and prevent injury. This principle underscores the importance of acting to prevent harm rather than using force as a punitive or retaliatory measure. Proper training often informs individuals about when and how to appropriately implement self-defense tactics to ensure that their actions remain within the bounds of legality and ethics.

Other options, such as the justification of force in dangerous situations alone, verbal threats, or competitive sports, do not encompass the broader context of self-defense laws, which primarily focus on the protection of oneself or others in immediate danger rather than general threats or organized activities.