What happens if a passerby causes injury while preventing a potential suicide?

When a passerby intervenes to prevent a potential suicide and subsequently causes injury, their actions are typically considered justified. This stems from the concept of the defense of necessity, where an individual can take reasonable action in order to prevent greater harm—in this case, the potential loss of life. The law often recognizes that intervening in a situation where a life is at risk is a moral and social duty, and as long as the actions taken are reasonable and proportionate to the situation, the passerby can be justified in their conduct.

It's important to note that while good intentions guide these actions, the specifics can be subject to local laws and circumstances. However, the general principle supports the idea that intervening to save a life can be justified even if it inadvertently causes injury to another person. This context illustrates why the passerby would not be charged with assault nor held liable for damages, as their primary motivation was to prevent a tragedy. The requirement to provide medical assistance is generally not an obligation placed on bystanders unless they are trained individuals like medical professionals.