In legal proceedings, which type of defense is known as the 'ordinary defense'?

The term 'ordinary defense' refers to a standard form of defense that asserts a defendant's innocence in legal proceedings. This type of defense is foundational in both criminal and civil cases, where the burden of proof is on the prosecution or the plaintiff to establish guilt or liability. By claiming innocence, the defendant is essentially contending that the presented evidence is insufficient to prove their wrongdoing beyond a reasonable doubt.

In this context, asserting innocence is a common strategy employed in legal defense, as it aligns with the principle that a defendant is presumed innocent until proven guilty. This type of defense can encompass a range of assertions, evidence, and arguments to establish that the defendant did not commit the act or is not liable for the alleged offenses.

The other options do not accurately encapsulate the concept of an 'ordinary defense.' For instance, a claim of self-defense specifically pertains to justifying the use of force in a criminal context, while options relating to civil cases or factors unrelated to legal liability do not touch upon the fundamental premise of asserting one's innocence, which is central to the concept of the 'ordinary defense.'